GRAMMAR
CLAUSE
AS EXCHANGE
GROUP:
HANIFAH FAJRIATI (2317)
REYNA FADILLA (2317)
SYLVIA NADILLA (2317)
AIDA PUTRI SARI (2317108)
MARDHATILLA (2317)
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT - 5C
IAIN
BUKITTINGGI
2019/2020
INTRODUCTION
In study of language, there are
many structures of grammar. Grammar is a policy to produce a good sentence.
Before become a sentence, the word has a term obey the form. Such as, phrase,
clause and then sentence. In this paper, clause has some function in
grammatical structure. There are clause as exchange, clause as message, clause
as significance of clause as exchange It is about the relationship speakers
forge with listeners through the form of language. Interpersonal in the act of speaking, the
speaker adopts for himself a particular speech role, and in so doing assigns to
the listener a complementary role that he wishes him to adopt in his turn.
Language is interaction process between the speaker and listener. Proposition
and proposal question command demanding Statement offer giving information
goods & services.
In this paper, we will discuss
about clause as exchange (Proposal, proposition, and mood structure).
DICUSSION
A. What Is Clause?
A clause is a group of words that
contains a verb (and usually other components too). A clause may form part of a
sentence or it may be a complete sentence in itself. Clause simultaneously
encodes 3 (main) strands of Meaning: Experiential (ideational), interpersonal,
and textual (Halliday, 1978).
- The
nature of dialogue
An interpretation of the clause in
its function as a message, analysing it as a two-part structure with the
elements theme and rheme. We shall now turn to another aspect of the meaning of
the clause, its meaning as an exchange. Here the principal grammatical system
is that of MOOD. The speaker is not only doing something himself; he is also
requiring something of the listener. Typically, therefore, an ‘act’ of speaking
is something that might more appropriately be called an interact: it is an
exchange, in which giving implies receiving and demanding implies giving in
response.
- The
Mood element
a. Structure
of the Mood
When we come to look closely at
statements and questions,and at the various responses to which these naturally
give rise,we find that in English they are typically expressed by means of a
particular kind of grammatical variation: variation which extends over just one
part of the clause, leaving the remainder unaffected.
Mood is a system through which
interpersonal meanings are realized within the conversation. It consists of two
parts:
1) The
subject, which is a nominal group, and
2) The
finite operator, which is part of a verbal group, and the remainder of those
parts are called residue.
Example:
They
|
Are
|
Discussing
|
About
mathematic
|
Subject
|
Finite
|
Predicator
|
Adjunct
|
Mood
|
Residue
|
From the structure, we may find
that a mood element of an English clause typically consists of subject +
finite. The Finite element is one of the small numbers of verbal operators
expressing tense, modality and polarity. These are listed below:
Finite verbal
operators, Temporal:
Past
|
Present
|
Future
|
Did,
was
Had,
Used to
|
Does,
is
Has
|
Will,
shall
Would,Should
|
Modal:
Low
|
Median
|
High
|
Can,
may
Would,
might (dare )
|
Will,
would
Is
to, was to
|
Must,
ought to
Need,
Has to, had to
|
(Halliday 1994: 76)
These verbal operators also have
negative counterparts, e.g. didn’t, won’t, can’t, wouldn’t, mustn’t.
b. Meaning
of Subject and Finite
1) The
Finite element
The Finite element
makes the proposition finite:
I.
Circum scribes the proposition.
II.
Brings the proposition down to earth, so
that it can be argued about
III.
Gives the proposition a point of reference
in the here-and-now: by reference to the time of speaking: PRIMARY TENSE (the old man was crossing the road) by reference to the judgement of the speaker: MODALITY
(it can’t be true).
Has the function of making the
proposition finite. That is to say, it circumscribes it; it brings the
proposition down to earth, so that it is something that can be argued about. A
good way to make something arguable is to give it a point of reference in the
here and now; and this is what the Finite does.
2) The
Subject
“The Subject supplies the rest of what
it takes to form a proposition: namely, something by reference to which the proposition
can be affirmed or denied.” “It is
perhaps easier to see this principle of responsibility in a proposal (a ‘goods-&-services’
clause), where the Subject specifies the one that is actually responsible for realizing (i.e.in this
case, for carrying out) the off eror command. For example ,in I’ll open the gate,
shall I? (offer) the opening depends on me; in Stop shouting, you over there! (command)
it is for you to desist or otherwise.”
The Subject supplies the rest of
what it takes to form a proposition: namely, something by reference to which
the proposition can be affirmed or denied. Here the Subject is dissociated from
the Actor; but the Subject still specifies the one who is responsible for the
success of the proposal.
3) A
further note on the Subject
The definition of Subject inherited
from classical times was a morphological one: it was that nominal element —
‘noun or pronoun’ — that is in the nominative case, and that displays person
and number concord with the (finite) verb.
c. Function
of the Mood element
Hence the Mood element has a
clearly defined semantic function: it carries the burden of the clause as an
interactive event.
3. Other elements of Mood structure
a. Structure
of the Residue
The Residue contains one Predicator,
either one or two Complements, and any number of Adjuncts (typically no more than
seven):
The car
|
Had
|
four bicycles
wheels
|
Subject
|
Finite
|
Complement
|
Mood
|
Residue
|
The residue
element it consists of predicator, one or more complement(s), and any number of
different types of adjuncts.
a. Predicator
is the verb part of a clause, the bit which tell what’s doing, happening or
being. There are also non-finite (to + verb and verb + ing) clauses containing
a predicator but no finite element, for example:
So as to give
Henry more roo,
To give
|
Henry
|
more room
|
Predicator
|
Complement
|
Complement
|
Halliday (1994:
79) claims that there are two verbs in English which in simple past and simple
present tense appears as finite only, without being fused with a distinct
element as predicator. These are “be” and “have”
b. Complement
answers the question “is/ had what”, “to whom”, “did to what”. The complements
have the potential to be Subject.
Henry Ford built
his first car in his backyard.
His first car
answers the question: did to (built) what?
c. Adjunct
Subsequently, Axl will probably sing
normally, fortunately.
circumstantial: normally, modal: Mood:
probably, modal: Comment: fortunately conjunctive: subsequently.
Circumstantial
adjunct answer the question “how”, “when”, “where”, “by whom”. Example: In the
symphony was played badly by an amateur orchestra during a concert Saturday
night at the Performing Art Centre. “Badly” is an adjunct, answering the
question how. “By an amateur orchestra” is an adjunct, answering the question
whom. “During a concert and Saturday night” are adjuncts, answering the
question when. “At the Performing Art Centre” is an adjunct, answering the
question where.
These are all
circumstantial adjunct. There are several other types of adjuncts. One of these
is centrally relevant to analysis of MOOD. The two which fall outside of mood
structure are conjunctive adjunct and comment adjunct. Conjunctive adjunct
include item such as, for instance, anyway, moreover, meanwhile, therefore,
nevertheless. While comment adjunct express the speakers’ comment on what
he/she is saying, such as, frankly, apparently, hopefully, etc.
1. Interpersonal
adjunct
This involves
treating a text as a dialogue. Basically, this means dividing the text into
things you can argue with. there are two special types which do not follow the
same principles of ordering, and do not fall within the Residue at all. These
are the modal Adjuncts and the conjunctive Adjuncts.
a. Mood
adjunct, on the other hand, both express interpersonal meanings and do fall
within mood structure, more particularly within the mood element. Mood adjuncts
relate specifically to the meaning of the finite verbal operators, expressing
probability, usuallity, obligation, inclination or time.
b. Comment
adjunct
The difference is that comment
Adjuncts are less closely tied to the grammar of mood; they are restricted to
‘indicative’ clauses (those functioning as propositions), and express the
speaker’s attitude either to the proposition as a whole or to the particular
speech function.
2. Conjunctive
Adjuncts With conjunctive Adjuncts, we come to the limits of the concept of the
clause as exchange.
3. Vocatives
and Expletives Another element that figures in the structure of the clause as
exchange, but outside the scope of the Mood and Residue, is the Vocative.
- Polarity
Polarity is the system of ‘yes’ and
‘no’. Your Work sheet contains examples of
unmarked and marked positive, and unmarked and marked negative forms. Informal written English, it is impossible to distinguish
between unmarked negative and marked negative.
Traditional formal grammars therefore recognize only the ‘marked positive’, sometimes
labeling it the ‘Emphatic Mood’.
- Imperatives
The imperative has a different system of PERSON from the indicative. Since
the imperative is the mood for exchanging goods-&-services, its
Subject is ‘you’ or ‘me’ or ‘you and me’
- Modality
The system of modality spans the space
between the two poles of positive and negative:
He likes Mozart. He certainly likes Mozart. He probably likes Mozart. He possibly
likes Mozart. He possibly doesn’t like Mozart. He probably doesn’t like Mozart.
He certainly doesn’t like Mozart. He doesn’t like Mozart. This will be the topic
for next week.
- Ellipsis
of (part or all of) the Mood
For any clause, there is one choice
of Subject that is ‘unmarked’—that is assumed,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary. In a giving clause (off error statement), the unmarked Subject is
‘I’; while in a demanding clause (question
or command), the unmarked Subject is ‘you’.
CONCLUSION
A clause is a group of words that
contains a verb (and usually other components too). Interpersonal meaning
(clause as exchange) expresses relations among participants in the situation
and the speaker’s own intrusion. (Halliday, 1978:46)
Statements and questions involve
exchanges of information and they are called propositions while offers and
commands are exchanges of goods and services called proposals. Mood is a system
through which interpersonal meanings are realized within the conversation. From
the structure, we may find that a mood element of an English clause typically
consists of subject + finite.
Reference
M.
A. K. Halliday, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, third edition (2004).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar